Compare · updated 2026-11-01
Claude Haiku vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Haiku is better at none of the task types we measure; Kimi K3.1 Pro is better at quick answers, writing, coding, reasoning, maths, structured data, long documents, translation. Claude Haiku is the cheaper of the two on output.
Measured quality by task
| Task | Claude Haiku | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick answers | 85/100 | 91/100 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Writing | 89/100 | 92/100 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Coding | 82/100 | 89/100 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Reasoning | 74/100 | 85/100 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Maths | 79/100 | 81/100 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Structured data | 86/100 | 92/100 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Long documents | 87/100 | 90/100 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Translation | 83/100 | 91/100 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
Quality is Nivana’s measured score for each kind of task, from weekly pairwise evals judged by models from several labs. Prices are live AI Gateway list prices per million tokens. Updated 2026-11-01. How this is measured.
Price and context
| Claude Haiku | Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Lab | Anthropic | Moonshot |
| Input per 1M tokens | $0.1 | $2 |
| Output per 1M tokens | $0.5 | $10 |
| Typical chat answer | $0.00050 | $0.010 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Router picks it for | Fallback only | Fallback only |
Which should you use?
Use the one that wins the kind of work you do most, unless the price gap outweighs the quality gap for easy requests. Or don’t choose: Nivana scores both, and the rest of the pool, on every request and sends it to whichever is best for that request.
Questions
Is Claude Haiku better than Kimi K3.1 Pro?
On Nivana’s weekly evals Claude Haiku scores higher on 0 of 8 task types and Kimi K3.1 Pro on 8 (quick answers, writing, coding, reasoning, maths, structured data, long documents, translation). Neither is better at everything.
Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3.1 Pro: 89/100 against 82/100 for Claude Haiku on Nivana’s coding evals.
Which is better for writing, Claude Haiku or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3.1 Pro: 92/100 against 89/100 for Claude Haiku on Nivana’s writing evals.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Claude Haiku: $0.5 per million output tokens against $10 for Kimi K3.1 Pro, about 20.0× less. A typical chat answer costs about $0.0005 on Claude Haiku and $0.010 on Kimi K3.1 Pro.
Or let the router pick, per request
Nivana sends every message to the model that scores best for it, sets how hard it thinks, and tells you which one answered. 2,000 free credits to start, no card.